Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground · Georgia
Fortis Engineering Solutions
Chamblee, GA · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 6.9
- Avg TCR
- 2.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Fortis Engineering Solutions runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 6.9
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 2.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 3
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Fortis Engineering Solutions's OSHA Total Case Rate of 6.9 to the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS benchmark of 2.8 (245% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Fortis Engineering Solutions's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.8 industry benchmark.
Where Fortis Engineering Solutions falls in its industry
1,948 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele establishmentsSafer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.
Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 84 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele employers in Georgia.
Trend analysis for Fortis Engineering Solutions
Between 2019 and 2021, Fortis Engineering Solutions's Total Case Rate improved from 9.4 to 4.3 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 54% decrease across 2 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2021, at a TCR of 4.3, while 2019 saw the highest rate, at 9.4, a spread of 5.1 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Fortis Engineering Solutions recorded 3 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 3 injuries, 1 illnesses shown on this page for Fortis Engineering Solutions are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 237130 - Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2021)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
2 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 92,695 hours worked = 4.32 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Fortis Engineering Solutions (this establishment) | 6.86 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction industry avg | 2.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 237130 |
| Georgia state avg (all industries) | 4.11 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Fortis Engineering Solutions to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2021: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 2 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 9.4 | 9.4 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Fortis Engineering Solutions's reported OSHA injury record versus its Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 245% of the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground benchmark, Fortis Engineering Solutions reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Fortis Engineering Solutions's safety grade?
How many injuries has Fortis Engineering Solutions reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Georgia, and by nearby establishments in Chamblee - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~6.9)
Similar size (~20 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.