Commercial building construction general contractors · Minnesota

Progressive Building Systems

St Michael, MN · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Progressive Building Systems runs at 263% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Progressive Building Systems: 7.6 TCR = 263% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Progressive Building Systems safety composite

Progressive Building Systems scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2018

Progressive Building Systems injury rate improved

Progressive Building Systems's TCR fell 3.7 from 13.3 in 2016 to 9.6 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=9.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · St Michael, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 263% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #106/130
  • PHOTO Mill City Constructi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mill City Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Progressive Building Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Progressive Building Systems averages 7.6 TCR (263% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Progressive Building Systems TCR series: 2016=13.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=9.6 · BLS 2.9

Where Progressive Building Systems falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #106 safest of 130 Commercial building constructi employers in Minnesota.

Progressive Building Systems (29 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Progressive Building Systems
Progressive Building Systems (29 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Progressive Building Systems has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 9.6 0.0 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 13.3 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MN · St Michael

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 7 employers in St Michael, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mill City Construction, Inc. 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hubbell Construction Services 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR R.L. Reppert, Inc. 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Boy's Steel Erection, Inc. 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy LLP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE The tru Shrimp Company 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2530-Redwood Falls, MN-FND (Monsanto Co.) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasota Stone Fabricators 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR J&B Group St Michael 689 FTE
CITY-NEAR B & D Plumbing, Heating & AC Inc. 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR B & D Plumbing & Heating 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Michael 84 FTE
NAT-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Portland 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Warm Springs Rehab of Victoria 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Consumer Solutions Division - West 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-PD-AGS-AUGUSTA-PD 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fostrian Court Assisted Living 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2497 Adie Road Maryland Heights 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wayne NJ (Riverview Dr) Office 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bird Equipment LLC of Ohio 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.