Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Fountain View Village

Fountain Hills, AZ · ~141 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fountain View Village runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Fountain View Village: 4.0 TCR = 106% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fountain View Village safety composite

Fountain View Village scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2024

Fountain View Village injury rate improved

Fountain View Village's TCR fell 3.8 from 6.0 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 308.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.0 · 2017=100.8 · 2023=308.4 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fountain Hills, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 106% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/173
  • PHOTO Greenfield Home
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~141 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greenfield Home (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Fountain View Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fountain View Village averages 4.0 TCR (106% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fountain View Village TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=100.8 · 2023=308.4 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Fountain View Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Fountain View Village (141 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Fountain View Village
Fountain View Village (141 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Fountain View Village has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 0.0 2 0 0
2023 308.4 0.0 0 5 0
2017 100.8 22.4 9 0 0
2016 6.0 5.2 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Fountain Hills

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 18 employers in Fountain Hills, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greenfield Home 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brentland Woods 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chancellor Gardens at Clearfield 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Las Fuentes Resort Village 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE BPG Designs 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tel Tech Networks 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forever Nutraceutical, LLC 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHXPLT PHXPLT - PHX PLANT 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0017-0017-01291 FAC-01291-FOUNTAIN HILLS-AZ 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0017-0017-01291 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY 0017 1291 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1432 - Fountain Hills 117 FTE
NAT-TCR Champion Window of Charlotte 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Covington Court Health and Rehabilitation Center 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Forest City - Public Works 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Simmons Animal Nutrition-Milan 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Memphis Dc 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Denver 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stamford Hilton 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Formall Inc 141 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.