Engineering services · Virginia
Framatome Nuclear Parts Center
Lynchburg, VA · ~29 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 1.5
- Avg TCR
- 0.5
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Framatome Nuclear Parts Center runs at 298% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Engineering services workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 1.5
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 0.5
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 1
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Framatome Nuclear Parts Center's OSHA Total Case Rate of 1.5 to the Engineering services BLS benchmark of 0.5 (298% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Framatome Nuclear Parts Center's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 0.5 industry benchmark.
Where Framatome Nuclear Parts Center falls in its industry
1,106 Engineering services establishmentsSafer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.
Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 75 Engineering services employers in Virginia.
Trend analysis for Framatome Nuclear Parts Center
Between 2017 and 2018, Framatome Nuclear Parts Center's Total Case Rate improved from 3.0 to 0.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 100% decrease across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 3.0, a spread of 3.0 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Framatome Nuclear Parts Center recorded 1 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 1 injuries shown on this page for Framatome Nuclear Parts Center are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 541330 - Engineering services.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 45,948 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Framatome Nuclear Parts Center (this establishment) | 1.49 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Engineering services industry avg | 0.50 | BLS IIF, NAICS 541330 |
| Virginia state avg (all industries) | 4.16 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Framatome Nuclear Parts Center to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2018: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Framatome Nuclear Parts Center's reported OSHA injury record versus its Engineering services peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 298% of the Engineering services benchmark, Framatome Nuclear Parts Center reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Engineering services sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Framatome Nuclear Parts Center's safety grade?
How many injuries has Framatome Nuclear Parts Center reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Virginia, and by nearby establishments in Lynchburg - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~1.5)
Similar size (~29 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.