Electric Power Distribution · North Carolina

Franklin Operations Center

Franklin, NC · ~42 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Franklin Operations Center runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade A.

Franklin Operations Center: 0.5 TCR = 43% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Franklin Operations Center safety composite

Franklin Operations Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

Franklin Operations Center injury rate improved

Franklin Operations Center's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Franklin, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/107
  • PHOTO Chicago West Tech
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chicago West Tech (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Franklin Operations Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Franklin Operations Center averages 0.5 TCR (43% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Franklin Operations Center TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Franklin Operations Center falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 107 Electric Power Distribution employers in North Carolina.

Franklin Operations Center (42 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Franklin Operations Center
Franklin Operations Center (42 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Franklin Operations Center has fewer employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · NC · Franklin

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 34 employers in Franklin, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chicago West Tech 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCKINNEY SVC CT 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilco Electrical llc 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canton General Svc Ctr 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Vernon Hatchery 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPI USA NC LLC - Southport 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALBEMARLE-WMSTN 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gastonia Operations Center 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Macon County, NC 540 FTE
CITY-NEAR MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP 341 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1217 279 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1217 252 FTE
NAT-TCR Stark Aerospace 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hajoca 719 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hajoca 036 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR VA - Windsor - 25400 Old Mill Rd - Keurig Green Mountain Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hart Park Square 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mulberry Gardens Assisted Living 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Ridge Home Health 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gsa Dallas 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.