Home nursing services (except private practices) · Minnesota

North Ridge Home Health

New Hope, MN · ~42 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
5.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North Ridge Home Health runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Home nursing services (except private practices) workplace, earning a grade D.

North Ridge Home Health: 7.1 TCR = 136% of Home nursing services (except private practices) BLS 5.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North Ridge Home Health safety composite

North Ridge Home Health scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.1

2018→2024

North Ridge Home Health injury rate improved

North Ridge Home Health's TCR fell 11.1 from 13.4 in 2018 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 22.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=13.4 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=22.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621610 · New Hope, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 136% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #90/129
  • PHOTO AAH Avera Sacred Hea…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AAH Avera Sacred Heart Home Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

North Ridge Home Health in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North Ridge Home Health averages 7.1 TCR (136% of the Home nursing services (except private practices) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North Ridge Home Health TCR series: 2018=13.4 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=22.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 5.2

Where North Ridge Home Health falls in its industry

3,635 Home nursing services (except establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #90 safest of 129 Home nursing services (except employers in Minnesota.

North Ridge Home Health (42 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North Ridge Home Health
North Ridge Home Health (42 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4

North Ridge Home Health has fewer employees than the Home nursing services (except private pr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.1 0.1 4 0 0
2022 0.2 0.2 3 5 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 22.2 22.2 2 5 0
2019 11.2 7.5 3 0 0
2018 13.4 13.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621610 · MN · New Hope

3,635 Home nursing services (except private practices) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 95 employers in New Hope, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AAH Avera Sacred Heart Home Care 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JH Home Health & Hospice 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NDV 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interim Healthcare of Tulsa 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michael Foods Inc.- GY2 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redwood Falls, MN-PS 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willmar Municipal Utilities 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benson Power, LLC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Therese of New Hope 391 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horwitz, Inc 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hope - Main Store 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Education Center 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Blum & Sons Electric 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Round Rock 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 08024-08-08-MARYSVILLE 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Otterbein New Albany 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mulberry Gardens Assisted Living 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nokomis LLC. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gastonia Operations Center 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Franklin Operations Center 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.