Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Washington

Franklin PUD - Office

Pasco, WA · ~62 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Franklin PUD - Office runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Franklin PUD - Office: 1.6 TCR = 58% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Franklin PUD - Office safety composite

Franklin PUD - Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2019→2024

Franklin PUD - Office injury rate improved

Franklin PUD - Office's TCR fell 8.0 from 8.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=8.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Pasco, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/49
  • PHOTO MGE Underground, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MGE Underground, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Franklin PUD - Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Franklin PUD - Office averages 1.6 TCR (58% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Franklin PUD - Office TCR series: 2019=8 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Franklin PUD - Office falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 49 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Washington.

Franklin PUD - Office (62 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Franklin PUD - Office
Franklin PUD - Office (62 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Franklin PUD - Office has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.0 6.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · WA · Pasco

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 134 employers in Pasco, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MGE Underground, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sturgeon Electric Company, Inc. T&D 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilson Construction Co. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Service Area 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Warren Morgan Orchards 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewis County PUD - Main Office 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unimark Construction Group, LLC 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE NSK12 - North Sky - Kent, WA 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pasco Plant 1,387 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pasco Processing LLC 719 FTE
CITY-NEAR PASCO WA 680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lourdes Health 604 FTE
NAT-TCR T1 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Staker Parson Oil Terminal 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Toll Solutions LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Signode Industrial Group Plastic Packaging 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bryllan LLC 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Parts (Corporate) - MN 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chicago Field Office 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Complete Care at villa Pines 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.