Retirement communities, continuing care · California

Freedom Village Retirement Community

Lake Forest, CA · ~278 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Freedom Village Retirement Community runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade B.

Freedom Village Retirement Community: 2.8 TCR = 73% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Freedom Village Retirement Community safety composite

Freedom Village Retirement Community scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Freedom Village Retirement Community: 0.0 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.95× in 2021

Freedom Village Retirement Community's TCR rose 3.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 3.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lake Forest, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 73% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #14/216
  • PHOTO 0309-Inniswood Village
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~278 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 0309-Inniswood Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Freedom Village Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Freedom Village Retirement Community averages 2.8 TCR (73% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Freedom Village Retirement Community TCR series: 2017=0 · 2019=4.6 · 2021=3.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Freedom Village Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 216 Retirement communities, contin employers in California.

Freedom Village Retirement Community (278 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Freedom Village Retirement Community
Freedom Village Retirement Community (278 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Freedom Village Retirement Community has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.7 2.6 7 0 0
2019 4.6 1.9 10 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Lake Forest

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 90 employers in Lake Forest, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 0309-Inniswood Village 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wren Place 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Springhouse Estates 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silverado Home Office - 101 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE NORTHEAST C&O - 1 278 FTE
STATE-SIZE NOVO Construction, Inc. 278 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Mechanical Inc. Pittsburg Area (Main Office) 278 FTE
STATE-SIZE Martinez Steel 278 FTE
CITY-NEAR Panasonic Avionics Corporation 2,047 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARB, Inc. 1,334 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest 598 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASSA ABLOY Americas Residential, Inc., Lake Forest 594 FTE
NAT-TCR Chris-Tel Company of Southwest Florida Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Des Moines TC 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 1323 - Coral Springs Fl Whse 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Russell-Moore Lumber Company Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Louisville Operations, 7929 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guardian Industries - DeWitt 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4765-MIACCB708 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson Ofc/Whse 278 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.