Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · California

Fresno WasteWater Division

Fresno, CA · ~164 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fresno WasteWater Division runs at 573% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

Fresno WasteWater Division: 6.9 TCR = 573% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fresno WasteWater Division safety composite

Fresno WasteWater Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2018→2019

Fresno WasteWater Division injury rate improved

Fresno WasteWater Division's TCR fell 2.1 from 7.9 in 2018 to 5.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.9 · 2019=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 573% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #51/74
  • PHOTO WVWA Roanoke Regiona…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~164 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WVWA Roanoke Regional Water Pollution Control Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fresno WasteWater Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fresno WasteWater Division averages 6.9 TCR (573% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fresno WasteWater Division TCR series: 2018=7.9 · 2019=5.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Fresno WasteWater Division falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 74 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in California.

Fresno WasteWater Division (164 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Fresno WasteWater Division
Fresno WasteWater Division (164 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Fresno WasteWater Division has more employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.8 4.4 8 0 0
2018 7.9 7.2 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · CA · Fresno

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WVWA Roanoke Regional Water Pollution Control Plant 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MOC 2 - Public Utilities 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works - Waste Water Management 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wastewater Treatment Facility 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cottonwood 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE GloriAnn Farms Brawley 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Coast Packing, Inc. 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR Discovery Care Center 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR FW Russell and Sons Disposal, Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Plasma Biological Services - Jackson, TN 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Peoria IL Thrift Store 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Green Bay (HR) 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bella Terra Morton Grove Living and Rehab 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate - Bel Ridge, MO 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Lodge of Four Seeasons, LLC 164 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.