Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system · North Carolina

Wastewater Treatment Facility

Smithfield, NC · ~27 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wastewater Treatment Facility runs at 571% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

Wastewater Treatment Facility: 6.8 TCR = 571% of Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wastewater Treatment Facility safety composite

Wastewater Treatment Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2018→2024

Wastewater Treatment Facility injury rate improved

Wastewater Treatment Facility's TCR fell 4.9 from 7.3 in 2018 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.3 · 2019=11.3 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=12.9 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Smithfield, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 571% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #7/11
  • PHOTO MOC 2 - Public Utili…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MOC 2 - Public Utilities (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Wastewater Treatment Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wastewater Treatment Facility averages 6.8 TCR (571% of the Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wastewater Treatment Facility TCR series: 2018=7.3 · 2019=11.3 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=12.9 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Wastewater Treatment Facility falls in its industry

400 Waste collection, treatment, a establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 Waste collection, treatment, a employers in North Carolina.

Wastewater Treatment Facility (27 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Wastewater Treatment Facility
Wastewater Treatment Facility (27 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Wastewater Treatment Facility has fewer employees than the Waste collection, treatment, and disposa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2023 12.9 12.9 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.1 3.6 2 0 0
2019 11.3 7.5 3 0 0
2018 7.3 7.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · NC · Smithfield

400 Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 62 employers in Smithfield, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MOC 2 - Public Utilities 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WVWA Roanoke Regional Water Pollution Control Plant 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fresno WasteWater Division 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Los Coyotes Water Reclamation Plant 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bissette Farms, Inc 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyde County Pullet Farm 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyde County Pullet 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Price Logging Inc 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnston Health 1,593 FTE
CITY-NEAR Government Complex (County Courts, Administration & Law Enforcement Buildings) 790 FTE
CITY-NEAR AAF Flanders Smithfield 428 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1321 401 FTE
NAT-TCR Uponor - Hutchinson 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Heights of Alamo 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Clear-Com Carlsbad 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilton Garden Inn 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thomas Concrete of Georgia Tucker 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar Jacksonville East 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar Glendale 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alpine House of Ravenna 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.