Retirement communities, continuing care · Iowa

Friendship Village Retirement Community

Waterloo, IA · ~271 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
28.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Friendship Village Retirement Community runs at 760% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Friendship Village Retirement Community: 28.9 TCR = 760% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Friendship Village Retirement Community safety composite

Friendship Village Retirement Community scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 21% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

8/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 28.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−19.5

2020→2024

Friendship Village Retirement Community injury rate improved

Friendship Village Retirement Community's TCR fell 19.5 from 28.0 in 2020 to 8.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 45.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=28.0 · 2021=32.3 · 2022=45.4 · 2023=30.2 · 2024=8.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Waterloo, IA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 28.9 · 760% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #121/121
  • PHOTO Evergreen Memory Care
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~271 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Evergreen Memory Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Friendship Village Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Friendship Village Retirement Community averages 28.9 TCR (760% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Friendship Village Retirement Community TCR series: 2020=28 · 2021=32.3 · 2022=45.4 · 2023=30.2 · 2024=8.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Friendship Village Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #121 safest of 121 Retirement communities, contin employers in Iowa.

Friendship Village Retirement Community (271 employees, TCR 28.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Friendship Village Retirement Community
Friendship Village Retirement Community (271 employees, TCR 28.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Friendship Village Retirement Community has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.6 8.1 10 8 0
2023 30.2 28.8 9 55 0
2022 45.4 39.5 15 70 0
2021 32.3 29.3 5 49 1
2020 28.0 28.0 4 51 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IA · Waterloo

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 172 employers in Waterloo, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Memory Care 28.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hoffman Senior Living 29.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR WellQuest Palo Alto Commons 29.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marion Bickford 28.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE McAninch Corporation 271 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stryten Manchester LLC 271 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6728-00030023-29 270 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monogram Prepared Meats LLC 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR Black Hawk County Extension 4,790 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waterloo Pork Plant 2,801 FTE
CITY-NEAR UnityPoint 2,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR JD Waterloo Tractor and Cab Assembly Operations 1,605 FTE
NAT-TCR Buena Vista Care Center 28.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Synergy Delivery, LLC 28.9 TCR
NAT-TCR WIFT,LLC 28.9 TCR
NAT-TCR DAP-US Corp 28.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Century Casino Cape Girardeau 271 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seohan Auto / Seohan NTN USA Corp. 271 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04971 - San Diego Hauling 271 FTE
NAT-SIZE 021 - Gull Rd Comstock Twp 271 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.