Door frames and sash, metal, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Frontline Building Products

Green Bay, WI · ~43 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Frontline Building Products runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Door frames and sash, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Frontline Building Products: 3.6 TCR = 109% of Door frames and sash, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Frontline Building Products safety composite

Frontline Building Products scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2016→2024

Frontline Building Products injury rate improved

Frontline Building Products's TCR fell 3.5 from 3.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.5 · 2017=12.2 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332321 · Green Bay, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 109% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/30
  • PHOTO National Custom Holl…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: National Custom Hollow Metal (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Frontline Building Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Frontline Building Products averages 3.6 TCR (109% of the Door frames and sash, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Frontline Building Products TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=12.2 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Frontline Building Products falls in its industry

515 Door frames and sash, metal, m establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 30 Door frames and sash, metal, m employers in Wisconsin.

Frontline Building Products (43 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Frontline Building Products
Frontline Building Products (43 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Frontline Building Products has fewer employees than the Door frames and sash, metal, manufacturi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2021 4.5 2.3 2 0 0
2020 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2019 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2018 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2017 12.2 12.2 4 0 0
2016 3.5 3.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332321 · WI · Green Bay

515 Door frames and sash, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR National Custom Hollow Metal 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CGI Windows and Doors, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CGI Commercial, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crystal Window & Door Systems, Ltd - New York 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holsum Irish Dairy 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barron Hatchery 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Babcock Receiving 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riverside Generating Station 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR New Braunfels 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Owens & Minor Louisville 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Liberty Christian School 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood Suites Ocala at Heathbrook 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fresh Meadow Power Piping, LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recology Portland 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horizon Environmental Services, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Fork Farms 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.