Frames, door and window, metal, manufacturing · Arkansas

National Custom Hollow Metal

Little Rock, AR · ~47 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

National Custom Hollow Metal runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Frames, door and window, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

National Custom Hollow Metal: 3.6 TCR = 109% of Frames, door and window, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

National Custom Hollow Metal safety composite

National Custom Hollow Metal scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

National Custom Hollow Metal: 0.0 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2024

National Custom Hollow Metal's TCR rose 7.3 from 0.0 in 2018 to 7.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332321 · Little Rock, AR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 109% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Frontline Building P…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Frontline Building Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

National Custom Hollow Metal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows National Custom Hollow Metal averages 3.6 TCR (109% of the Frames, door and window, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

National Custom Hollow Metal TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=2.2 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 3.3

Where National Custom Hollow Metal falls in its industry

515 Frames, door and window, metal establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Frames, door and window, metal employers in Arkansas.

National Custom Hollow Metal (47 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate National Custom Hollow Metal
National Custom Hollow Metal (47 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 4.1

National Custom Hollow Metal has fewer employees than the Frames, door and window, metal, manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 2.4 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.7 5.7 2 0 0
2020 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 6.5 6.5 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332321 · AR · Little Rock

515 Frames, door and window, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 446 employers in Little Rock, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Frontline Building Products 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CGI Commercial, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CGI Windows and Doors, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Janus AZ 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE AR 2 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Systems Plant Services, Inc.- Blytheville, AR NYS-Nucor Yamato 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kimbel Mechanical Systems, Inc Central AR 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Novus Arkansas, LLC 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arkansas Children's Hospital 3,946 FTE
CITY-NEAR LITCX0UPS LIT - UPS 3,415 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LIT1 2,510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - Little Rock 2,500 FTE
NAT-TCR R. G. Ross Construction Co., Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Berkeley High School 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Adrian Inteva 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gram Equipment of America, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Finkl Steel Composite 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innovated Machhine & Tool Co., Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spitz, Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashland Feed & Seed Co. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.