Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Texas

Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth

Mesquite, TX · ~313 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth: 0.5 TCR = 17% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth safety composite

Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth held a steady TCR band

Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.3 in 2023 to 0.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=0.3 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Mesquite, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #22/161
  • PHOTO Henkels & McCoy West…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~313 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Henkels & McCoy West, LLC - Pomona, CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth averages 0.5 TCR (17% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth TCR series: 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 161 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Texas.

Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth (313 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth
Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth (313 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Future Infrastructure - Dallas Ft Worth has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.3 2 0 0
2023 0.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · TX · Mesquite

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 166 employers in Mesquite, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Henkels & McCoy West, LLC - Pomona, CA 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richardson Wayland Electrical Company 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bright Star Solutions 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meade Industries, Inc 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE HES Brownfield - North Facility 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE KEYSTONE CONCRETE PLACEMENT SAN ANTONIO 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rebar Reinforcement Placers, LLC 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE McCormick 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR MESQUITE (TXMES) 2,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR TXMES - MESQUITE 2,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Canadian Solar US Module Manufacturing 883 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZMES 874 FTE
NAT-TCR Adrian High School 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Powell Fabrication & Mfg. LLC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Location 15012 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Michigan Senate 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bureau of Disability Determination Services 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stew Leonard's Paramus 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ambulatory Care Center 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keolis Div 301, Reno Nevada 313 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.