Building, apartment, rental or leasing · North Carolina

GEM Management LLC

Charlotte, NC · ~289 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GEM Management LLC runs at 399% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building, apartment, rental or leasing workplace, earning a grade F.

GEM Management LLC: 5.6 TCR = 399% of Building, apartment, rental or leasing BLS 1.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GEM Management LLC safety composite

GEM Management LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2023

GEM Management LLC injury rate improved

GEM Management LLC's TCR fell 1.4 from 5.4 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 145.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.4 · 2017=6.8 · 2019=145.8 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531110 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.6 · 399% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #24/28
  • PHOTO Union Mill Run, L.L.C.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 105 inj
  • SIZE ~289 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Union Mill Run, L.L.C. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

GEM Management LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GEM Management LLC averages 5.6 TCR (399% of the Building, apartment, rental or leasing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GEM Management LLC TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2017=6.8 · 2019=145.8 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=4 · BLS 1.4

Where GEM Management LLC falls in its industry

1,100 Building, apartment, rental or establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 28 Building, apartment, rental or employers in North Carolina.

GEM Management LLC (289 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate GEM Management LLC
GEM Management LLC (289 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5

GEM Management LLC has more employees than the Building, apartment, rental or leasing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.0 1.1 11 0 0
2022 5.6 1.0 16 1 0
2021 4.3 4.3 12 1 0
2020 7.5 1.9 21 3 0
2019 145.8 20.8 12 2 0
2017 6.8 1.4 17 2 0
2016 5.4 2.4 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531110 · NC · Charlotte

1,100 Building, apartment, rental or leasing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Union Mill Run, L.L.C. 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Varin Employment Services, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 54 4th Street 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milhaus Management LLC 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wayne J. Griffin Electric Inc. - Durham 289 FTE
STATE-SIZE Procter and Gamble-Greensboro PHC 289 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gardner Denver Thoms Inc 289 FTE
STATE-SIZE Snap-on Power Tools, Inc. 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR 3804-Aloft/Element Austin Dt 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Blake Drilling Company, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Village Plaza Sparkle 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Spring Senior Assisted Living 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Robinson Construction Company 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE Standard Motor Products Greenville Operations 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE Location 19011 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bush Hog Inc. 289 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.