Transportation · North Carolina

6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System

Charlotte, NC · ~289 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Transportation workplace, earning a grade F.

6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System: 6.8 TCR = 212% of Transportation BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System safety composite

6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System held a steady TCR band

6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System's TCR held near 0.3 from 5.7 in 2017 to 5.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.7 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 926120 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 212% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Tillamook County Tra…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 106 inj
  • SIZE ~289 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tillamook County Transportation District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System averages 6.8 TCR (212% of the Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System TCR series: 2017=5.7 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=5.4 · BLS 3.2

Where 6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System falls in its industry

208 Transportation establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Transportation employers in North Carolina.

6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System (289 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System
6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System (289 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 3.6

6935-Cats-Charlotte Area Transit System has more employees than the Transportation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.4 4.6 14 0 0
2021 9.3 7.7 24 0 0
2020 2.6 2.3 7 0 0
2019 9.3 8.9 24 1 0
2018 8.4 7.7 23 0 0
2017 5.7 5.3 14 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

926120 · NC · Charlotte

208 Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tillamook County Transportation District 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lebanon Residency 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minnesota Department of Transportation District 7 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MDTA Police Headquarters and Support 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wayne J. Griffin Electric Inc. - Durham 289 FTE
STATE-SIZE Procter and Gamble-Greensboro PHC 289 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gardner Denver Thoms Inc 289 FTE
STATE-SIZE Snap-on Power Tools, Inc. 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR 087140-Southbury Po 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 1855-TXAUS41 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 352884-Flg-Little Neck Sta 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 416617-Pit-Blawnox Br 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Iron County Medical Care Facility 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE 055862-Pasadena Po 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE tkSCS Livermore Discovery 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE Accuray Incorporated - Madison WI 289 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.