Water treatment and distribution · Minnesota

Saint Paul Regional Water Services

Saint Paul, MN · ~225 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saint Paul Regional Water Services runs at 563% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Saint Paul Regional Water Services: 6.8 TCR = 563% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saint Paul Regional Water Services safety composite

Saint Paul Regional Water Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2017→2020

Saint Paul Regional Water Services injury rate improved

Saint Paul Regional Water Services's TCR fell 2.6 from 8.9 in 2017 to 6.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.9 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Saint Paul, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 563% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #6/9
  • PHOTO North Side Canal Com…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~225 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North Side Canal Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Saint Paul Regional Water Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saint Paul Regional Water Services averages 6.8 TCR (563% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saint Paul Regional Water Services TCR series: 2017=8.9 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=6.3 · BLS 1.2

Where Saint Paul Regional Water Services falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 9 Water treatment and distributi employers in Minnesota.

Saint Paul Regional Water Services (225 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Saint Paul Regional Water Services
Saint Paul Regional Water Services (225 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Saint Paul Regional Water Services has more employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 6.3 5.0 14 0 0
2019 5.6 5.2 12 1 0
2018 6.2 5.3 14 0 0
2017 8.9 7.1 19 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · MN · Saint Paul

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 291 employers in Saint Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North Side Canal Company 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portland Water Bureau Customer Service 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Water Treatment City of Wyoming 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Utility - Water Department 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walman Optical Service Center - Brooklyn Park 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harvard Services Group of Minnesotta 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Essentia Health Moose Lake Hospital 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHS - Harmony River 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR HE-Midway Corporate Campus 2,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Public Safety 2,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office, Andersen, DC1 & Golden Rule 1,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV St Josephs Hospital 1,426 FTE
NAT-TCR Volunteer Behavioral Health Care Services-Chattanooga/ Johnson 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Durand Agronomy 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ace Hardware Retail Support Center (Rocklin) 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR brandywine living at brandall estates 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tonkin Parts Center 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riviana Foods Freeport 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schindler Holland R&D 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE RCN Telecom Services, LLC - Bethlehem Ave C. 225 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.