Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing · Ohio

General Industry/Vinyl Fencing

Groveport, OH · ~73 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Industry/Vinyl Fencing runs at 168% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

General Industry/Vinyl Fencing: 5.6 TCR = 168% of Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Industry/Vinyl Fencing safety composite

General Industry/Vinyl Fencing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

General Industry/Vinyl Fencing: 2.0 → 11.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 11.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.13× in 2019

General Industry/Vinyl Fencing's TCR rose 9.8 from 2.0 in 2016 to 11.8 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 2.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Groveport, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 168% of ind

  • DART 11.8 DART
  • RANK #210/270
  • PHOTO 1WW
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1WW (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

General Industry/Vinyl Fencing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Industry/Vinyl Fencing averages 5.6 TCR (168% of the Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Industry/Vinyl Fencing TCR series: 2016=2 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=11.8 · BLS 3.3

Where General Industry/Vinyl Fencing falls in its industry

2,838 Building materials (e.g., fasc establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #210 safest of 270 Building materials (e.g., fasc employers in Ohio.

General Industry/Vinyl Fencing (73 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate General Industry/Vinyl Fencing
General Industry/Vinyl Fencing (73 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

General Industry/Vinyl Fencing has fewer employees than the Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 11.8 11.8 12 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2016 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · OH · Groveport

2,838 Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 135 employers in Groveport, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1WW 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Holland 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Target Windows & Doors 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plastic Plate South Carolina Mold 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE A. Brown & Sons Nursery, Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay Shore 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE 971-NiSource-Toledo OH-Op Ctr Manhattan Blv 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greater Dayton Construction LTD 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ohio Fulfillment Center (OFC) 1,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 9475 992 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus 859 FTE
CITY-NEAR RICART AUTOMOTIVE PERSONNEL INC 737 FTE
NAT-TCR US TX Houston Coml 4377 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR J.L. Becker Company 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0025 1883 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Florin Rd Pipe & Precast 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Praxair Ecorse, MI 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caraustar Industries, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance Electric L.P. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whites Paint Blast, LLC 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.