Beverages, dietary, dairy and nondairy based · Michigan

General Mills Yoplait Reed City

Reed City, MI · ~413 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Mills Yoplait Reed City runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Beverages, dietary, dairy and nondairy based workplace, earning a grade D.

General Mills Yoplait Reed City: 4.1 TCR = 124% of Beverages, dietary, dairy and nondairy based BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Mills Yoplait Reed City safety composite

General Mills Yoplait Reed City scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

General Mills Yoplait Reed City: 4.1 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.22× in 2024

General Mills Yoplait Reed City's TCR rose 1.9 from 4.1 in 2019 to 6.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311514 · Reed City, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 124% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #10/13
  • PHOTO Ingredients - Drying…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 78 inj
  • SIZE ~413 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ingredients - Drying - Fort Morgan CO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

General Mills Yoplait Reed City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Mills Yoplait Reed City averages 4.1 TCR (124% of the Beverages, dietary, dairy and nondairy based BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Mills Yoplait Reed City TCR series: 2019=4.1 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=2.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=6 · BLS 3.3

Where General Mills Yoplait Reed City falls in its industry

185 Beverages, dietary, dairy and establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 13 Beverages, dietary, dairy and employers in Michigan.

General Mills Yoplait Reed City (413 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate General Mills Yoplait Reed City
General Mills Yoplait Reed City (413 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 3.5

General Mills Yoplait Reed City has more employees than the Beverages, dietary, dairy and nondairy b median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 5.0 23 1 0
2023 4.8 4.6 19 0 0
2021 2.8 2.3 10 1 0
2020 2.7 1.5 11 0 0
2019 4.1 1.9 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311514 · MI · Reed City

185 Beverages, dietary, dairy and nondairy based employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 32 employers in Reed City, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ingredients - Drying - Fort Morgan CO 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maple Island Inc 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reckitt (MeadJohnson LLC) 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sandwich 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quinnesec Mill 413 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand River Aseptic Manufacturing 413 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 3726 413 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spectrum Health Big Rapids Hospital 413 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Supply & Construction Company - ALL 1,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company 821 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hydaker-Wheatlake - Michigan Statewide 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPECTRUM HEALTH - REED CITY 411 FTE
NAT-TCR Betzen Trenching Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Nycm-90-New York, Ny - Mutual 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kinetics Noise Control 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR KNS International 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Caesars Forum Convention Center 413 FTE
NAT-SIZE Community Bridges 413 FTE
NAT-SIZE Postler & Jaeckle Corp. 413 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aerofil Technology 413 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.