Transmission and distribution line construction · Michigan

The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company

Reed City, MI · ~821 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Transmission and distribution line construction workplace, earning a grade A.

The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company: 1.2 TCR = 42% of Transmission and distribution line construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company safety composite

The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2022→2024

The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company injury rate improved

The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.6 in 2022 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.6 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Reed City, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #24/54
  • PHOTO DJ's Electrical, Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~821 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DJ's Electrical, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company averages 1.2 TCR (42% of the Transmission and distribution line construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company TCR series: 2022=1.6 · 2023=1 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 2.8

Where The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company falls in its industry

1,605 Transmission and distribution establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 54 Transmission and distribution employers in Michigan.

The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company (821 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company
The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company (821 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company has more employees than the Transmission and distribution line const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.4 7 0 0
2023 1.0 0.5 9 0 0
2022 1.6 0.8 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MI · Reed City

1,605 Transmission and distribution line construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 32 employers in Reed City, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DJ's Electrical, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Enertech Resources LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR STURGEON ELECTRIC CALIFORNIA, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grattan Line Construction 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE PICO Enterprises INC 821 FTE
STATE-SIZE McLaren Health Management Group 823 FTE
STATE-SIZE GRAND BLANC COMMUNITY SCHOOLS 824 FTE
STATE-SIZE PRIORITY HEALTH MANAGED BENEFITS INC 825 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Supply & Construction Company - ALL 1,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hydaker-Wheatlake - Michigan Statewide 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Mills Yoplait Reed City 413 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPECTRUM HEALTH - REED CITY 411 FTE
NAT-TCR Minnesota Department of Health - Bemidji Office 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Orangeburg Warehouse 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 4320 Waterleaf 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR L3Harris EDO Western Corporation 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hampton Roads Sanitation District 821 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Flyer USA 821 FTE
NAT-SIZE Komatsu America Corp PMO 821 FTE
NAT-SIZE Supply Chain Hooksett NH 821 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.