Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing · New York

Utica Metal Products, Inc.

Utica, NY · ~71 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Utica Metal Products, Inc. runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Utica Metal Products, Inc.: 3.1 TCR = 57% of Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Utica Metal Products, Inc. safety composite

Utica Metal Products, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Utica Metal Products, Inc.: 5.5 → 7.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2024

Utica Metal Products, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.9 from 5.5 in 2016 to 7.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Utica, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.1 · 57% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Mancor Ohio Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mancor Ohio Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Utica Metal Products, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Utica Metal Products, Inc. averages 3.1 TCR (57% of the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Utica Metal Products, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=6 · 2024=7.4 · BLS 5.4

Where Utica Metal Products, Inc. falls in its industry

510 Job stampings, automotive, met establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Job stampings, automotive, met employers in New York.

Utica Metal Products, Inc. (71 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Utica Metal Products, Inc.
Utica Metal Products, Inc. (71 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Utica Metal Products, Inc. has fewer employees than the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.4 3.0 2 3 0
2023 6.0 1.5 1 3 0
2022 1.5 0.0 0 1 0
2021 1.6 0.0 0 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.4 1.2 1 1 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2017 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2016 5.5 0.0 0 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · NY · Utica

510 Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 148 employers in Utica, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mancor Ohio Inc 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pontiac Automation & Assembly (Challenge Manufacturing-Plant 8) 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bayloff Stamped Products 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gestamp South Carolina 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE PATCHOGUE-NY68 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Albany 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rodriguez Construction Group, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iroquois Bar Corp 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Resource Center for Independent Living 3,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faxton St. Lukes 1,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Elizabeth Medical Center 1,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utica University 915 FTE
NAT-TCR Woodbridge Chattanooga Formed Plastics 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bessemer 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lezzer Commercial Door 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sherwood Midwest LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Waters of Union City LLC 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE AOC Tennessee Resins 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kalispell Lumber 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eversource - Madison 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.