Dispensing and measuring pumps (e.g., gasoline, lubricants) manufacturing · North Carolina
Gilbarco Veeder-Root
GREENSBORO, NC · ~1,595 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 1.6
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Gilbarco Veeder-Root runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate — far safer than the typical Dispensing and measuring pumps (e.g., gasoline, lubricants) manufacturing workplace — earning a grade A.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 1.6
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 98
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Gilbarco Veeder-Root's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 6 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).
Injury rate over time
Gilbarco Veeder-Root's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 333913.
Gilbarco Veeder-Root has an average TCR of 1.6, which is 49% of the industry average (3.3) for Dispensing and measuring pumps (e.g., gasoline, lubricants) manufacturing. This is significantly better than average.
Safety Insights for Gilbarco Veeder-Root
Gilbarco Veeder-Root operates an establishment with approximately 1,595 full-time equivalent workers in GREENSBORO, NC, classified under the Dispensing and measuring pumps (e.g., gasoline, lubricants) manufacturing industry (NAICS 333913). Across 6 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 98 recordable injuries, 78 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.6 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the A letter grade (Excellent Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 3.3 for Dispensing and measuring pumps (e.g., gasoline, lubricants) manufacturing, Gilbarco Veeder-Root's workforce experiences 49% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR below the benchmark signals that controls, training, or automation may be outperforming peers.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 6 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Gilbarco Veeder-Root as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Gilbarco Veeder-Root's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 333913 — Dispensing and measuring pumps (e.g., gasoline, lubricants) manufacturing.
DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2024)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
3 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 2,861,021 hours worked = 0.21 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Gilbarco Veeder-Root (this establishment) | 1.63 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 6-year avg |
| Dispensing and measuring pumps (e.g., gasoline, lubricants) manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 333913 |
| North Carolina state avg (all industries) | 3.89 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Gilbarco Veeder-Root to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 12 reportable incidents · 12 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2021: 51 reportable incidents · 16 injuries, 35 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2020: 56 reportable incidents · 26 injuries, 30 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 38 reportable incidents · 26 injuries, 12 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 15 reportable incidents · 14 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 16 | 35 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 26 | 30 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 26 | 12 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 14 | 1 | 0 |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Gilbarco Veeder-Root's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has Gilbarco Veeder-Root reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.