Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Minnesota

Glacial Ridge Health System

Glenwood, MN · ~344 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glacial Ridge Health System runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade A.

Glacial Ridge Health System: 3.7 TCR = 49% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glacial Ridge Health System safety composite

Glacial Ridge Health System scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2017→2023

Glacial Ridge Health System injury rate improved

Glacial Ridge Health System's TCR fell 7.2 from 9.3 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.3 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Glenwood, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 3.7 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #75/249
  • PHOTO PLAINS REGIONAL MEDI…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 61 inj
  • SIZE ~344 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PLAINS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Glacial Ridge Health System in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glacial Ridge Health System averages 3.7 TCR (49% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Glacial Ridge Health System TCR series: 2017=9.3 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 7.5

Where Glacial Ridge Health System falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 249 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Minnesota.

Glacial Ridge Health System (344 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Glacial Ridge Health System
Glacial Ridge Health System (344 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Glacial Ridge Health System has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 0.4 6 0 0
2022 2.8 0.8 7 0 0
2021 1.1 0.0 3 0 0
2020 1.9 0.4 5 0 0
2019 2.4 0.8 6 0 0
2018 6.2 0.8 15 0 0
2017 9.3 0.5 19 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MN · Glenwood

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 15 employers in Glenwood, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PLAINS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington County Hospital and Clinics 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aria Health - Bucks 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avoyelles Hospital 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rochester Community and Technical College 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE Conservation Corps 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northland Concrete & Masonry 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trident Seafoods 343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glenwood 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnewaska Area Schools #2149 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnewaska Area HS 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Pope 104 FTE
NAT-TCR Georgia 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6234 Lauderdale Lakes 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Harris Engineering, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ui 7524 (Dallas - F) 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Metra Electronics Corporation 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE L. F. Jennings, Inc. 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Montebello Ca Plant 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phillips 66 Research Center 344 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.