Correctional institutions · Minnesota

MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City

Rush City, MN · ~343 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City runs at 565% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade F.

MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City: 18.1 TCR = 565% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City safety composite

MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City: 5.8 → 22.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 26.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.18× in 2021

MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City's TCR rose 16.7 from 5.8 in 2018 to 22.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 26.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Rush City, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.1 · 565% of ind

  • DART 21.3 DART
  • RANK #29/32
  • PHOTO Louisville Jefferson…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~343 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Louisville Jefferson County Metro Govt - Corrections - Main Jail (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City averages 18.1 TCR (565% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City TCR series: 2018=5.8 · 2020=26 · 2021=22.4 · BLS 3.2

Where MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 32 Correctional institutions employers in Minnesota.

MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City (343 employees, TCR 18.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City
MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City (343 employees, TCR 18.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City has more employees than the Correctional institutions median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 22.4 21.3 17 45 0
2020 26.0 25.3 15 59 0
2018 5.8 4.4 16 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · MN · Rush City

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 12 employers in Rush City, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Louisville Jefferson County Metro Govt - Corrections - Main Jail 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Institution for Men 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CDC MULE CREEK STATE PRISON 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gus Harrison Correctional Facility 18.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northland Concrete & Masonry 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trident Seafoods 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLN 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE HSC 343 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCF-Rush City 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plastech Corporation 267 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rush City ISD #139 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rush City ISD #139-Jacobsen Elementary 82 FTE
NAT-TCR ORF - Ground Ops 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Blizzard Transportation LLC 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Michael Brothers Transportation 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR N&M Construction Inc 18.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anaheim Hauling 343 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pittsburgh Office 343 FTE
NAT-SIZE Special Devices Inc. 343 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tyler Area Office 343 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.