Conservation and reclamation agencies · Minnesota

Conservation Corps

St Paul, MN · ~344 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Conservation Corps runs at 507% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Conservation and reclamation agencies workplace, earning a grade F.

Conservation Corps: 16.2 TCR = 507% of Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Conservation Corps safety composite

Conservation Corps scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2019→2020

Conservation Corps injury rate improved

Conservation Corps's TCR fell 3.2 from 17.9 in 2019 to 14.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 17.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=17.9 · 2020=14.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · St Paul, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 16.2 · 507% of ind

  • DART 9.4 DART
  • RANK #45/45
  • PHOTO District 3 - Makakil…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~344 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: District 3 - Makakilo Community Park (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Conservation Corps in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Conservation Corps averages 16.2 TCR (507% of the Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Conservation Corps TCR series: 2019=17.9 · 2020=14.6 · BLS 3.2

Where Conservation Corps falls in its industry

413 Conservation and reclamation a establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 45 Conservation and reclamation a employers in Minnesota.

Conservation Corps (344 employees, TCR 16.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Conservation Corps
Conservation Corps (344 employees, TCR 16.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Conservation Corps has more employees than the Conservation and reclamation agencies median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 14.6 9.4 20 5 0
2019 17.9 6.9 21 18 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · MN · St Paul

413 Conservation and reclamation agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 230 employers in St Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR District 3 - Makakilo Community Park 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village of South Elgin - Municipal Annex 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Burbank - Parks and Recreation - Aquatics/McCambridge 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benton County Natural Areas, Parks, and Events 16.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rochester Community and Technical College 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glacial Ridge Health System 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northland Concrete & Masonry 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trident Seafoods 343 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1010 REGIONS HOSPITAL 5,313 FTE
CITY-NEAR HPI-Ramsey 5,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travelers St Paul Office 2,256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marsden Bldg Maintenance 1,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Bickford of Oswego 16.2 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Hartsville 16.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Innovative Air, Inc. 16.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZNPI 16.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE California Harvesters, Inc 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smiths Tubular Systems-Laconia, Inc. 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nashville Public Library 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hydro - St. Augustine 344 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.