Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · North Carolina

Global Logistic Carriers

Creedmoor, NC · ~71 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Global Logistic Carriers runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

Global Logistic Carriers: 1.8 TCR = 28% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Global Logistic Carriers safety composite

Global Logistic Carriers scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Global Logistic Carriers: 0.0 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.21× in 2024

Global Logistic Carriers's TCR rose 2.2 from 0.0 in 2022 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Creedmoor, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 28% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #8/214
  • PHOTO Endurance Logistics …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Endurance Logistics LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Global Logistic Carriers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Global Logistic Carriers averages 1.8 TCR (28% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Global Logistic Carriers TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Global Logistic Carriers falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 214 Express delivery services (exc employers in North Carolina.

Global Logistic Carriers (71 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Global Logistic Carriers
Global Logistic Carriers (71 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Global Logistic Carriers has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NC · Creedmoor

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 20 employers in Creedmoor, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Endurance Logistics LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 2841 DEMOCRAT RD 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NiOble LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 381943611 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charlotte Meter To Payment - PNG 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crawford Sprinkler Co of Raleigh 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&D Coffee & Tea West Winds 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE No Evil Foods LLC 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Creedmoor 870 FTE
CITY-NEAR Firstmark Aerospace Corporation 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3032_5860 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR Creedmoor Plant 105 FTE
NAT-TCR Facility 508 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Marc Glassman Inc 01SL 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ampacet 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenbriar Ag Management Inc 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colonial Health AND rehab 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ardent Mills Albany 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Williams Bay Health Services 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crossroads Care Center of Weyauwega 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.