Titanium and titanium alloy bar, billet, rod, sheet, strip, and tubing made from purchased metals or scrap · New York

Goldman Titanium, Inc.

Buffalo, NY · ~39 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Goldman Titanium, Inc. runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Titanium and titanium alloy bar, billet, rod, sheet, strip, and tubing made from purchased metals or scrap workplace, earning a grade C.

Goldman Titanium, Inc.: 3.1 TCR = 95% of Titanium and titanium alloy bar, billet, rod, sheet, strip, and tubing made from purchased metals or scrap BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Goldman Titanium, Inc. safety composite

Goldman Titanium, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2018→2021

Goldman Titanium, Inc. injury rate improved

Goldman Titanium, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.3 from 4.0 in 2018 to 2.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.0 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331491 · Buffalo, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 95% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #6/9
  • PHOTO Specialty Metals Plant
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Specialty Metals Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Goldman Titanium, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Goldman Titanium, Inc. averages 3.1 TCR (95% of the Titanium and titanium alloy bar, billet, rod, sheet, strip, and tubing made from purchased metals or scrap BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Goldman Titanium, Inc. TCR series: 2018=4 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Goldman Titanium, Inc. falls in its industry

113 Titanium and titanium alloy ba establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 9 Titanium and titanium alloy ba employers in New York.

Goldman Titanium, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Goldman Titanium, Inc.
Goldman Titanium, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Goldman Titanium, Inc. has fewer employees than the Titanium and titanium alloy bar, billet, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.8 1.9 3 0 0
2018 4.0 4.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331491 · NY · Buffalo

113 Titanium and titanium alloy bar, billet, rod, sheet, strip, and tubing made from purchased metals or scrap employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 532 employers in Buffalo, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Specialty Metals Plant 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jamestown North America 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR VDM Metals USA, LLC 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR USMe 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Woody Hill Farms, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bergen Farms LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora - Oakwood Dairy, LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE MN8 Energy LLC - New York Office 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buffalo General Hospital 3,556 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital of Buffalo 2,379 FTE
CITY-NEAR WNY Independent Living, Inc. 1,988 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kaleida Health Oishei Childrens Hospital 1,765 FTE
NAT-TCR Intralox, LLC - Hanover, MD 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood Suites Pittsburgh Downtown 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR New-Com Metal Products 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gainesville Plant 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Novo Power 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horizon - Corporate Office 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Integrated Component Systems, LLC 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.