Power generation, biomass · Arizona

Novo Power

Snowflake, AZ · ~39 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Novo Power runs at 215% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Power generation, biomass workplace, earning a grade F.

Novo Power: 2.6 TCR = 215% of Power generation, biomass BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Novo Power safety composite

Novo Power scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2016→2021

Novo Power injury rate improved

Novo Power's TCR fell 3.6 from 3.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221117 · Snowflake, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.6 · 215% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P61
  • PHOTO Wheelabrator Shasta …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Novo Power in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Novo Power averages 2.6 TCR (215% of the Power generation, biomass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Novo Power TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Novo Power falls in its industry

54 Power generation, biomass establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Novo Power (39 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 28 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Novo Power
Novo Power (39 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 28 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Novo Power has more employees than the Power generation, biomass median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.5 5.0 3 0 0
2017 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.6 3.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221117 · AZ · Snowflake

54 Power generation, biomass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 13 employers in Snowflake, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rio Bravo Rocklin 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Genesee Power Station 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR EDL- Johnston 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE MyLand 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sterling Grove 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sharp Drywall 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Abercrombie Pipeline Services, LLC Scottsdale/Cielo Azul 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Copperstate Farms 261 FTE
CITY-NEAR Copperstate Farms Management LLC 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR PFYF FINISHER & TRANS-EST 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARIZONA FINISHER & TRANS-EST 32 FTE
NAT-TCR Mar Cor Purification - Skippack, PA 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sewell Subaru of Dallas 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pagoda Electrical Inc 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR United Zion Retirmement Community 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goldman Titanium, Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horizon - Corporate Office 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE 31st and Wharton 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.