Employer · California

Good Samaritan Hospital

San Jose, CA · ~2,042 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Good Samaritan Hospital runs at 168% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade D.

Good Samaritan Hospital: 6.4 TCR = 168% of industry BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Good Samaritan Hospital safety composite

Good Samaritan Hospital scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Good Samaritan Hospital: 4.8 → 10.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2024

Good Samaritan Hospital's TCR rose 5.3 from 4.8 in 2017 to 10.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621999 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 168% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #61/116
  • PHOTO Haskell Healthcare C…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 372 inj
  • SIZE ~2,042 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Haskell Healthcare Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Good Samaritan Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Good Samaritan Hospital averages 6.4 TCR (168% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Good Samaritan Hospital TCR series: 2017=4.8 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=4.3 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=10.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Good Samaritan Hospital falls in its industry

461 industry establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 116 industry employers in California.

Good Samaritan Hospital (2,042 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Good Samaritan Hospital
Good Samaritan Hospital (2,042 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Good Samaritan Hospital has more employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.1 3.5 58 73 0
2023 6.9 3.1 21 74 0
2022 7.3 3.2 41 54 0
2021 6.8 3.1 46 43 0
2019 4.3 1.7 75 1 0
2018 4.3 1.8 63 0 0
2017 4.8 1.9 68 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621999 · CA · San Jose

461 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Haskell Healthcare Center 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Martinez Health Center 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5114 - AZ ASPC Phoenix - NaphCare AZ 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Florida Elks Children's Therapy Services 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CA018 2,040 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Bay Municipal Utility District 2,037 FTE
STATE-SIZE Panasonic Avionics Corporation 2,047 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 73 2,050 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Asphalt Recycling and Stabilization, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rutherford Supply 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 0594 - Lugoff SC DC 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 2124 - Philadelphia City Ave 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southern Management Companies 2,042 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Hospital of Central Connecticut-NB 2,042 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center 2,043 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center 2,044 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.