Warehouse and distribution center · Minnesota

Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center

Rogers, MN · ~200 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Warehouse and distribution center workplace, earning a grade B.

Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center: 3.4 TCR = 58% of Warehouse and distribution center BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center safety composite

Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center: 4.2 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.2× in 2023

Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center's TCR rose 1.0 from 4.2 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Rogers, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.4 · 58% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #42/83
  • PHOTO Book Fairs - Portland
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Book Fairs - Portland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center averages 3.4 TCR (58% of the Warehouse and distribution center BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center TCR series: 2017=4.2 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=1 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=5.2 · BLS 5.8

Where Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 Warehouse and distribution cen establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 83 Warehouse and distribution cen employers in Minnesota.

Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center (200 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center
Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center (200 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Graco Inc. - Rogers Distribution Center has more employees than the Warehouse and distribution center median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.2 4.1 4 5 0
2022 4.1 3.1 8 0 0
2021 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2020 1.6 1.1 3 0 0
2019 3.3 1.7 6 0 0
2018 4.1 4.1 8 0 0
2017 4.2 2.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MN · Rogers

9,477 Warehouse and distribution center employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 101 employers in Rogers, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Book Fairs - Portland 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stewart Moving and Storage of Richmond 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaCombe - 64490 Highway 434 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1500 GEODIS LOGISTICS 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rice Lake Construction Group 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE MMD Medical 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Motion Systems : New Hope 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cinch Connectivity Solutions 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Graco Inc. - Koch Center 607 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZMPG 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reinhart - Rogers - 0557 487 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foodservice Twin Cities - 0557 482 FTE
NAT-TCR Oakland Park Clr Ctr Outlet - #931 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 033 Get Real Surfaces, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Vibracoustic USA, Inc. Carmi Mixing Division 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mulch Manufacturing Callahan 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dept. of Revenue (1) 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northeast DC Packaged 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Groc 1st Shift #9901 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moog Aspen Motion Technologies, Inc 200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.