Gas Transmission · Michigan

Grand Rapids Wealthy Station

Grand Rapids, MI · ~185 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grand Rapids Wealthy Station runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gas Transmission workplace, earning a grade A.

Grand Rapids Wealthy Station: 1.3 TCR = 28% of Gas Transmission BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grand Rapids Wealthy Station safety composite

Grand Rapids Wealthy Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Grand Rapids Wealthy Station: 1.2 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.42× in 2024

Grand Rapids Wealthy Station's TCR rose 1.8 from 1.2 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 486210 · Grand Rapids, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 28% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #5/14
  • PHOTO Muskegon Service Cen…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~185 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Muskegon Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Grand Rapids Wealthy Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grand Rapids Wealthy Station averages 1.3 TCR (28% of the Gas Transmission BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grand Rapids Wealthy Station TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=3 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=3 · BLS 4.5

Where Grand Rapids Wealthy Station falls in its industry

56 Gas Transmission establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 14 Gas Transmission employers in Michigan.

Grand Rapids Wealthy Station (185 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Grand Rapids Wealthy Station
Grand Rapids Wealthy Station (185 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Grand Rapids Wealthy Station has more employees than the Gas Transmission median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 1.8 4 1 0
2023 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2022 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2020 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2019 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2017 3.0 1.2 5 0 0
2016 1.2 0.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

486210 · MI · Grand Rapids

56 Gas Transmission employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Muskegon Service Center 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Freedom Compression 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Clair Gas Fields 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pennsylvania - Southeast 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Arconic Whitehall Operations - Whitehall HRC Complex 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ascent Aerospace Macomb (GTS) 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paslin, Cherry Creek 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Avancez 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Potato King Transportation, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR USA NC Greensboro Stage Coach Trail Plant 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NISCO-Bremen 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Physical Therapy Texas (15121 Baylor Medical Center at Dallas - Acute) 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mje, LLC 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0501 Brookline 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compass Memorial Healthcare 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Teutopolis 185 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.