Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing · Indiana

NISCO-Bremen

Bremen, IN · ~350 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NISCO-Bremen runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

NISCO-Bremen: 1.3 TCR = 38% of Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NISCO-Bremen safety composite

NISCO-Bremen scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

NISCO-Bremen held a steady TCR band

NISCO-Bremen's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326291 · Bremen, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #3/20
  • PHOTO Saint-Gobain - Beave…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~350 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Saint-Gobain - Beaverton (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

NISCO-Bremen in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NISCO-Bremen averages 1.3 TCR (38% of the Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NISCO-Bremen TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where NISCO-Bremen falls in its industry

266 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 20 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., employers in Indiana.

NISCO-Bremen (350 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate NISCO-Bremen
NISCO-Bremen (350 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6

NISCO-Bremen has more employees than the Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2023 2.2 1.4 6 2 0
2022 2.8 0.8 6 4 0
2021 2.1 1.5 3 4 0
2020 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.7 0.7 3 0 0
2018 1.1 0.4 2 3 0
2017 0.6 0.2 1 2 0
2016 0.8 0.2 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326291 · IN · Bremen

266 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 28 employers in Bremen, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Saint-Gobain - Beaverton 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SRK Tennessee 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineered Materials : Woodridge 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robbins LLC - A Hexpol Company 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - NP Wagner 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Gold Inc. - Orestes 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE ContiTech 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE Magna MPT Muncie 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southwire Bremen 521 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bremen Wire Plant 510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Bearings LLC 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR Digger Specialties, Inc 264 FTE
NAT-TCR USA NC Greensboro Stage Coach Trail Plant 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Potato King Transportation, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Rapids Wealthy Station 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Devils Lake Main 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bedford Medical Center 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Park High School Dist 108 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE Department of Social Services 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE Santa Rosa Berry Farms, LLC 350 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.