Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) · North Carolina

Graphic Visual Solutions

Greensboro, NC · ~95 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Graphic Visual Solutions runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) workplace, earning a grade A.

Graphic Visual Solutions: 1.5 TCR = 46% of Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Graphic Visual Solutions safety composite

Graphic Visual Solutions scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Graphic Visual Solutions: 1.8 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2.57× in 2020

Graphic Visual Solutions's TCR rose 2.1 from 1.8 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #28/92
  • PHOTO AZ008 Phoenix Hummin…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AZ008 Phoenix Hummingbird (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Graphic Visual Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Graphic Visual Solutions averages 1.5 TCR (46% of the Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Graphic Visual Solutions TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=1 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Graphic Visual Solutions falls in its industry

2,001 Commercial lithographic (offse establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 92 Commercial lithographic (offse employers in North Carolina.

Graphic Visual Solutions (95 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Graphic Visual Solutions
Graphic Visual Solutions (95 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Graphic Visual Solutions has more employees than the Commercial lithographic (offset) printin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2017 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2016 1.8 1.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · NC · Greensboro

2,001 Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AZ008 Phoenix Hummingbird 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6890 Patchogue NY 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sandy Burbank LLC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Essentra HPC Moorestown 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Circle S Ranch NC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raleigh North Transmission and Distribution Operations Center 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE MB Haynes Corporation (Office) 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR CMC Traffic Control Specialists, Inc. dba CMC Construction 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR C.R. Bard Madison 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Avitecture, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Schoeneck Containers Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thrift Books Global, LLC (Dallas, TX) 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transportation 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE main office 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Marriott Century Center 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.