Transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Washington

Grays Harbor Transportation

Hoquiam, WA · ~97 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grays Harbor Transportation runs at 141% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade D.

Grays Harbor Transportation: 6.4 TCR = 141% of Transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grays Harbor Transportation safety composite

Grays Harbor Transportation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2022→2024

Grays Harbor Transportation injury rate improved

Grays Harbor Transportation's TCR fell 3.8 from 9.7 in 2022 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=9.7 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Hoquiam, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 141% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #7/11
  • PHOTO 4081 APPEARANCE MAIN…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4081 APPEARANCE MAINTENANCE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Grays Harbor Transportation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grays Harbor Transportation averages 6.4 TCR (141% of the Transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grays Harbor Transportation TCR series: 2022=9.7 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=6 · BLS 4.5

Where Grays Harbor Transportation falls in its industry

421 Transit systems, mixed mode (e establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 Transit systems, mixed mode (e employers in Washington.

Grays Harbor Transportation (97 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Grays Harbor Transportation
Grays Harbor Transportation (97 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Grays Harbor Transportation has fewer employees than the Transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 3.6 5 0 0
2023 3.4 2.2 2 1 0
2022 9.7 1.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · WA · Hoquiam

421 Transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 8 employers in Hoquiam, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4081 APPEARANCE MAINTENANCE 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metro Transit Rail Support Facility 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 55355 Visalia 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ashley, IN - Family Dollar 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Foushee and Associates Company, Inc 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Davis Door Service, Inc. 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE BrandSafway LLC - Boeing Everett 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE HQ 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hoquiam Healthcare, Inc., dba Pacific Care and Rehabilitation 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hoquiam Plywood Products 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR REG Grays Harbor, LLC 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Channel Point Village 33 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant Food Stores 6526 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hardin Tubular Sales Inc 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CoreCentric Solutions 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Charter Aarrowcast 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bliss Carwash LLC 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE BHC Fox Run Hospital INC 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5013-Oklahoma City Hauling 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 781 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.