Concrete pouring · Maryland

Great Eastern Concrete, Inc.

Frederick, MD · ~45 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Great Eastern Concrete, Inc. runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Concrete pouring workplace, earning a grade D.

Great Eastern Concrete, Inc.: 4.8 TCR = 173% of Concrete pouring BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Great Eastern Concrete, Inc. safety composite

Great Eastern Concrete, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Great Eastern Concrete, Inc.: 2.0 → 3.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 12.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2024

Great Eastern Concrete, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.8 from 2.0 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Frederick, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 173% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #21/30
  • PHOTO Sommercal Constructi…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sommercal Construction,Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Great Eastern Concrete, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Great Eastern Concrete, Inc. averages 4.8 TCR (173% of the Concrete pouring BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Great Eastern Concrete, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=12.3 · 2021=7 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Great Eastern Concrete, Inc. falls in its industry

1,314 Concrete pouring establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 30 Concrete pouring employers in Maryland.

Great Eastern Concrete, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Great Eastern Concrete, Inc.
Great Eastern Concrete, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Great Eastern Concrete, Inc. has fewer employees than the Concrete pouring median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 1.9 2 0 0
2023 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.0 0.0 3 0 0
2020 12.3 8.2 6 0 0
2019 10.3 8.2 5 0 0
2018 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · MD · Frederick

1,314 Concrete pouring employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 267 employers in Frederick, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sommercal Construction,Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Equipment Development Co. Inc 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cruz & Fazio Concrete, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR JHM Construction, LLC 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bell Nursery - Marydel 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE RBC South 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kemira Water Solutions Inc 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLW 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR MD-03 4,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing Center 775 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing 711 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific Frederick, MD (BID - Executive Way) 568 FTE
NAT-TCR The fresh Market 191 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Plains Wood River LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Clair County Road Commission - Central Service Center 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Stowe Woodward LLC WI (Andritz) 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Scrap Metal NC, LLC. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ben Parker Co., Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highland Engineering, Inc. 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.