Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Minnesota

Great Lakes Express

Centerville, MN · ~55 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Great Lakes Express runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Great Lakes Express: 13.8 TCR = 212% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Great Lakes Express safety composite

Great Lakes Express scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Great Lakes Express: 10.0 → 17.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 17.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.28× in 2024

Great Lakes Express's TCR rose 7.6 from 10.0 in 2023 to 17.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Centerville, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.8 · 212% of ind

  • DART 17.6 DART
  • RANK #93/113
  • PHOTO ORPOR - PORTLAND HUB
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ORPOR - PORTLAND HUB (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Great Lakes Express in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Great Lakes Express averages 13.8 TCR (212% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Great Lakes Express TCR series: 2023=10 · 2024=17.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Great Lakes Express falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #93 safest of 113 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Minnesota.

Great Lakes Express (55 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Great Lakes Express
Great Lakes Express (55 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Great Lakes Express has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.6 17.6 11 0 0
2023 10.0 10.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MN · Centerville

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 7 employers in Centerville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ORPOR - PORTLAND HUB 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MIMON - MONROE 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR HHHWEST HARTFORDCT 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR COALA - ALAMOSA 13.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Langhorst Pork, Inc. 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gemko of Forest Lake dba WDI Company 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE FCO Echo 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Melrose, MN (Arvig) 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centerville Elementary School 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centerville Elementary 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Van Gogh Express LLC 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR QE Dynamics LLC 53 FTE
NAT-TCR Golden Heights Personal Care Home 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR NHC Place Sumner 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Catholic Care Center 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mimon - Monroe 13.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Sarasota 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Worthington Steel Company Bowling Green 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Something Different Linen, Inc 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oklahoma City Courtyard 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.