Water treatment and distribution · Michigan

Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility

Detroit, MI · ~138 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade D.

Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility: 2.2 TCR = 184% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility safety composite

Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility held a steady TCR band

Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.3 in 2023 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=2.3 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Detroit, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.2 · 184% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #7/26
  • PHOTO East Tennessee Mecha…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: East Tennessee Mechanical Contractors (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility averages 2.2 TCR (184% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility TCR series: 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 26 Water treatment and distributi employers in Michigan.

Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility (138 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility
Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility (138 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility has more employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 3 0 0
2023 2.3 1.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · MI · Detroit

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 673 employers in Detroit, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR East Tennessee Mechanical Contractors 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Granger-Hunter Improvement District 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Culligan 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hoboken - OMI 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE DVM Utilities, Inc. 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butcher and Butcher Construction 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3211 Battle Creek Mill 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Airlane Northwest 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit Campus 8,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - DTW 6,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Corporation 5,241 FTE
NAT-TCR Canton 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Aspen Seating LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Occasions Group - IN - 0156-INSU1 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood Suites Columbus Hilliard 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE HART Center 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA San Diego 3355 Admiral Boland Way 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hewitt Young Electric, LLC. 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Makson Inc. 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.