Water treatment plants · New Jersey

Hoboken - OMI

Hoboken, NJ · ~44 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hoboken - OMI runs at 185% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Water treatment plants workplace, earning a grade D.

Hoboken - OMI: 2.2 TCR = 185% of Water treatment plants BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hoboken - OMI safety composite

Hoboken - OMI scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hoboken - OMI: 0.0 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2017

Hoboken - OMI's TCR rose 4.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Hoboken, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.2 · 185% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #15/33
  • PHOTO Kanawha Valley Opera…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kanawha Valley Operations Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Hoboken - OMI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hoboken - OMI averages 2.2 TCR (185% of the Water treatment plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hoboken - OMI TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Hoboken - OMI falls in its industry

727 Water treatment plants establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 33 Water treatment plants employers in New Jersey.

Hoboken - OMI (44 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hoboken - OMI
Hoboken - OMI (44 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Hoboken - OMI has fewer employees than the Water treatment plants median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 4.4 2.2 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · NJ · Hoboken

727 Water treatment plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 33 employers in Hoboken, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kanawha Valley Operations Center 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Tennessee Mechanical Contractors 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Granger-Hunter Improvement District 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAMS Linden Gen 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gary F. Gardner, Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Champion Specialty Services, LLC @ Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE A-Tech Concrete Co., Inc. 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Specialty Fulfillment : UNJ1 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Hoboken 599 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hoboken 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Now LLC - UNJ1 319 FTE
NAT-TCR James River Work Center 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Jarden Zinc Products 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HBSHSEPA34 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1855-CTBRI7 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Santa Anita 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Chillicothe Inc 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashland Nursing and Rehab LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insys Manufacturing, LLC 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.