Grass mowing equipment (except lawn and garden) manufacturing · Kansas

Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant

Abilene, KS · ~214 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Grass mowing equipment (except lawn and garden) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Grass mowing equipment (except lawn and garden) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant safety composite

Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2023→2024

Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant injury rate improved

Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=4.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333111 · Abilene, KS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/37
  • PHOTO Haber Technologies, …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~214 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Haber Technologies, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Grass mowing equipment (except lawn and garden) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant TCR series: 2023=4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant falls in its industry

433 Grass mowing equipment (except establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 37 Grass mowing equipment (except employers in Kansas.

Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant (214 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant
Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant (214 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant has more employees than the Grass mowing equipment (except lawn and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.0 2.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333111 · KS · Abilene

433 Grass mowing equipment (except lawn and garden) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 19 employers in Abilene, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Haber Technologies, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GREAT PLAINS MANUFACTURING INC - TIPTON 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Plains Manufacturing Inc. - Enterprise 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moly Manufacturing LLC 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lee Aerospace, Inc. 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDL Electric - Support Activities for Rail Transportation 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Garden Terrace of Overland Park 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fort Scott 215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abilene 620 FTE
CITY-NEAR MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM 436 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abilene - Landpride 294 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Plains Manufacturing Inc. - Abilene West 275 FTE
NAT-TCR Millet the Printer Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Perry Plant 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chatham Village 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR W&W|AFCO Steel Van Buren 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Riepen LLC 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Franklin Institute 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE TMF Center 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE 096 Lci 214 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.