Satellite dish, household-type, installation · Wisconsin

Green Bay Corporate

Green Bay, WI · ~31 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Bay Corporate runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Satellite dish, household-type, installation workplace, earning a grade A.

Green Bay Corporate: 0.4 TCR = 15% of Satellite dish, household-type, installation BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Bay Corporate safety composite

Green Bay Corporate scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Green Bay Corporate held a steady TCR band

Green Bay Corporate's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Green Bay, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/38
  • PHOTO Unitherm Columbia
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Unitherm Columbia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Green Bay Corporate in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Bay Corporate averages 0.4 TCR (15% of the Satellite dish, household-type, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Bay Corporate TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Green Bay Corporate falls in its industry

1,138 Satellite dish, household-type establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 38 Satellite dish, household-type employers in Wisconsin.

Green Bay Corporate (31 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Bay Corporate
Green Bay Corporate (31 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Green Bay Corporate has fewer employees than the Satellite dish, household-type, installa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · WI · Green Bay

1,138 Satellite dish, household-type, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Unitherm Columbia 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FORTNA - NAP Project - UPS Sweetwater 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Providence 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Longnecker Properties, Inc. 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agri-Tech/Grain 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redtail Ridge Dairy, LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Van Ansem Farms Inc 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE WI 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR SH - Patient Financial Services 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Orion Engineered Carbons, LLC Borger Plant 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Interstate Electronics Corporation 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Campus School 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Best Line Equipment - Shippensburg 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maumee Valley Fabricators, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastern Mechanical Services Inc - Only Branch 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE FPSS 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.