Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services · New Hampshire

Green Technical Services Inc.

Dover, NH · ~27 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Technical Services Inc. runs at 381% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Green Technical Services Inc.: 8.0 TCR = 381% of Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Technical Services Inc. safety composite

Green Technical Services Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2020→2023

Green Technical Services Inc. injury rate improved

Green Technical Services Inc.'s TCR fell 8.0 from 12.0 in 2020 to 4.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=12.0 · 2023=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Dover, NH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 381% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #10/10
  • PHOTO ITW/Hobart Service-B…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ITW/Hobart Service-Boston Branch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Green Technical Services Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Technical Services Inc. averages 8.0 TCR (381% of the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Technical Services Inc. TCR series: 2020=12 · 2023=4 · BLS 2.1

Where Green Technical Services Inc. falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and industrial mach establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 10 Commercial and industrial mach employers in New Hampshire.

Green Technical Services Inc. (27 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Technical Services Inc.
Green Technical Services Inc. (27 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Green Technical Services Inc. has fewer employees than the Commercial and industrial machinery repa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2020 12.0 12.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · NH · Dover

2,560 Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 73 employers in Dover, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ITW/Hobart Service-Boston Branch 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Syracuse - Penn Power Group 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PrairieLand Partners - Anthony 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FISHER & THOMPSON INC 101 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Company 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adam Vaillancourt Roofing 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCG:CG020 - CG020-Epping, NH 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Martineau Electric, Inc. 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wentworth Douglass Hospital 3,380 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wentworth-Douglass Hospital 3,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR WDH/CENTRAL AVENUE 2,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR Measured Progress 440 FTE
NAT-TCR Foam Fabricators 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pepper Incorporated 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Champion Window of Colorado Springs 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Zero Waste Energy Development Company (ZWEDC) 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Express & Suites 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn Manhattan 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shoreline Lumber Inc 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE HYDRAULICS 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.