Aerospace Electronic Systems · Arizona

Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations

Phoenix, AZ · ~595 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aerospace Electronic Systems workplace, earning a grade A.

Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Aerospace Electronic Systems BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations safety composite

Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2019

Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations injury rate improved

Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/25
  • PHOTO Goodrich Corporation…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~595 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goodrich Corporation (Rome NY) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Aerospace Electronic Systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=1 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations falls in its industry

650 Aerospace Electronic Systems establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 25 Aerospace Electronic Systems employers in Arizona.

Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations (595 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations
Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations (595 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations has more employees than the Aerospace Electronic Systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2017 1.0 0.5 6 0 0
2016 1.1 0.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · AZ · Phoenix

650 Aerospace Electronic Systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Corporation (Rome NY) 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGDS-TX24 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kent - Eng 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CDI - Jaycox 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Maricopa County - Clerk of the Superior Court (160) 596 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tucson Electric Power (Shared Services) 592 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-AZ 599 FTE
STATE-SIZE SCI, LLC - Phoenix 591 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR 2029-CPN Billings/Collections 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sales - Section 32 - Bloomington, MN 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 100 North St. - Teterboro 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Supported Employment Pasadena 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greenpoint Service Center (Ny50) 595 FTE
NAT-SIZE B&E Resources 595 FTE
NAT-SIZE 381604-Cincinnati Ndc 595 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1207 New Lenox School District #122 595 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.