Engine repair (except automotive, small engine) · North Carolina

Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner

Garner, NC · ~132 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Engine repair (except automotive, small engine) workplace, earning a grade B.

Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner: 1.5 TCR = 71% of Engine repair (except automotive, small engine) BLS 2.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner safety composite

Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2023

Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner injury rate improved

Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.8 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Garner, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/72
  • PHOTO MH Indianapolis
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MH Indianapolis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner averages 1.5 TCR (71% of the Engine repair (except automotive, small engine) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.4 · BLS 2.1

Where Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner falls in its industry

2,560 Engine repair (except automoti establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 72 Engine repair (except automoti employers in North Carolina.

Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner (132 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner
Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner (132 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner has more employees than the Engine repair (except automotive, small median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.2 3.5 6 0 0
2017 2.7 0.7 4 0 0
2016 1.8 1.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · NC · Garner

2,560 Engine repair (except automotive, small engine) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 139 employers in Garner, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MH Indianapolis 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR T&J Elmira 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR RENEW Energy SDFS 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TLOH 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charlotte, NC Office 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE US150: Charlotte 260 - SG 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lenoir Site 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iron Horse Contractors 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - RDU1 4,707 FTE
CITY-NEAR Overland Contracting Inc. 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR PBV-Garner 542 FTE
CITY-NEAR Region 056 506 FTE
NAT-TCR Questek Mfg Corp 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pregis- Pomona 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Truck Equipment Service Company 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas Best Block - HOUB 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Indian Oaks Living Center 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kadant Unaflex, LLC 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royal Oaks 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hollins University 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.