Packaging, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing · California

Pregis- Pomona

Pomona, CA · ~64 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pregis- Pomona runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Packaging, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Pregis- Pomona: 1.5 TCR = 45% of Packaging, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pregis- Pomona safety composite

Pregis- Pomona scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2017→2023

Pregis- Pomona injury rate improved

Pregis- Pomona's TCR fell 1.6 from 3.3 in 2017 to 1.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.3 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Pomona, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #4/26
  • PHOTO Innocor Foam Technol…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pregis- Pomona in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pregis- Pomona averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the Packaging, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pregis- Pomona TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Pregis- Pomona falls in its industry

474 Packaging, foam plastics (exce establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 26 Packaging, foam plastics (exce employers in California.

Pregis- Pomona (64 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pregis- Pomona
Pregis- Pomona (64 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Pregis- Pomona has fewer employees than the Packaging, foam plastics (except polysty median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2022 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2019 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2017 3.3 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · CA · Pomona

474 Packaging, foam plastics (except polystyrene), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 177 employers in Pomona, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - High Point 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Portage 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scott Manufacturing Henderson 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR UFP Grand Rapids 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDERA 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGS FARM LABOR CORPORATION 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arroyo Seco Vineyards, Inc 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center 3,804 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 524 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare 1,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkels & McCoy, Inc. - Pomona, CA 1,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Questek Mfg Corp 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gregory Poole Power Systems- Garner 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Packaging - Canton 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas Best Block - HOUB 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cascade Heating and Specialties Inc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ari Industries, Inc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE NC- High Point 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skywater 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.