Fiber cans and drums (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material) made from purchased paperboard · Missouri

Greif Wright City

Wright City, MO · ~41 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greif Wright City runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fiber cans and drums (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material) made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Greif Wright City: 2.5 TCR = 77% of Fiber cans and drums (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material) made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greif Wright City safety composite

Greif Wright City scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Greif Wright City: 0.0 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.25× in 2022

Greif Wright City's TCR rose 3.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322219 · Wright City, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO AJM Packaging - Sout…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AJM Packaging - Southgate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Greif Wright City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greif Wright City averages 2.5 TCR (77% of the Fiber cans and drums (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material) made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greif Wright City TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=5 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Greif Wright City falls in its industry

140 Fiber cans and drums (i.e., al establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Fiber cans and drums (i.e., al employers in Missouri.

Greif Wright City (41 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Greif Wright City
Greif Wright City (41 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Greif Wright City has fewer employees than the Fiber cans and drums (i.e., all-fiber, n median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2020 5.0 2.5 1 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322219 · MO · Wright City

140 Fiber cans and drums (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material) made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 19 employers in Wright City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AJM Packaging - Southgate 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clearwater Paper Elwood LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AJM Packaging - Joplin 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Letica-Tennessee 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CoverCress INC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Doe Run Company Exploration & Development 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8FB - Nuclear - Radiation Protection 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE 03H - Sub Mtce and Const - UEC West 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR EPC- Wright City 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR N and R of Warrenton Inc 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tech Manufacturing 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR OBE - Wright City 79 FTE
NAT-TCR 9277-104 Arrabelle at Vail Square 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1932 VGS - Owosso, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 055099-Customer Care Center - Ca 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 380812-Blacklick Po 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aluminum Die Casting CO/, Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elba DH 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE 04-Oakfield 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE 548055-Spo-Hays Park Sta 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.