Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing · California

Griswold Controls

Irvine, CA · ~76 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Griswold Controls runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Griswold Controls: 4.5 TCR = 136% of Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Griswold Controls safety composite

Griswold Controls scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Griswold Controls: 2.7 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.05× in 2020

Griswold Controls's TCR rose 3.6 from 2.7 in 2017 to 6.3 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · Irvine, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 136% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO PEBCO
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PEBCO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Griswold Controls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Griswold Controls averages 4.5 TCR (136% of the Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Griswold Controls TCR series: 2017=2.7 · 2020=6.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Griswold Controls falls in its industry

298 Automatic (i.e., controlling-t establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Automatic (i.e., controlling-t employers in California.

Griswold Controls (76 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Griswold Controls
Griswold Controls (76 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Griswold Controls has fewer employees than the Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regul median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 6.3 4.7 2 2 0
2017 2.7 1.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · CA · Irvine

298 Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 622 employers in Irvine, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PEBCO 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerson Automation Solutions Isolation Valves Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pentair Residential Filtration, LLC - Brookfield 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HILTON ACQUISITION COMPANY LLC 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O ADMINISTRATION 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3181_6797 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&J Labor,Inc. 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fujishige Farms, Inc. 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Irvine 16,029 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-10 4,926 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Lifesciences 4,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson and Johnson MDD CSS Irvine 3,775 FTE
NAT-TCR Novant Health UVA Health System Culpeper Medical Center 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR VRC Green Village 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sher-Rockee Mushroom Farms,LLC 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoffman Summer Wood 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Park Manor of Cypress Station 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jofran Sales Inc 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE MTS Springfield/Riverton 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dickson Electric System 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.