beauty supply store · New Jersey
Harmon Closter
CLOSTER, NJ · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 16.7
- Avg TCR
- 3.4
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Harmon Closter runs at 491% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical beauty supply store workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 16.7
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.4
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 3
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Harmon Closter's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).
Injury rate over time
Harmon Closter's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.4 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 446120.
Where Harmon Closter falls in its industry
99 beauty supply store establishmentsSafer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.1.
Harmon Closter has an average TCR of 16.7, which is 491% of the industry average (3.4) for beauty supply store. This is significantly worse than average.
Safety Insights for Harmon Closter
Harmon Closter operates an establishment with approximately 23 full-time equivalent workers in CLOSTER, NJ, classified under the beauty supply store industry (NAICS 446120). Across 2 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 3 recordable injuries, 0 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 16.7 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the F letter grade (Failing Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 3.4 for beauty supply store, Harmon Closter's workforce experiences 491% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked, a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers, so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR above the benchmark flags a higher-than-typical risk profile for jobseekers, insurers, and enforcement agencies to examine.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 2 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Harmon Closter as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries, there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Harmon Closter's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 446120 - beauty supply store.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2020)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 16,429 hours worked = 12.17 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Harmon Closter (this establishment) | 16.68 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Beauty supply stores industry avg | 3.40 | BLS IIF, NAICS 446120 |
| New Jersey state avg (all industries) | 4.90 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Harmon Closter to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2020: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 24.4 | 12.2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Harmon Closter's reported OSHA injury record versus its beauty supply store peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 491% of the beauty supply store benchmark, Harmon Closter reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider beauty supply store sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Harmon Closter's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has Harmon Closter reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.