Skilled nursing facilities · Georgia

Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation

Augusta, GA · ~88 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation runs at 333% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation: 21.6 TCR = 333% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation safety composite

Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 10% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

5/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation: 1.7 → 14.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 46.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.68× in 2023

Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation's TCR rose 12.9 from 1.7 in 2016 to 14.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 46.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Augusta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.6 · 333% of ind

  • DART 14.6 DART
  • RANK #234/259
  • PHOTO FPNC, Inc. dba Twin …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FPNC, Inc. dba Twin Lakes Therapy and Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation averages 21.6 TCR (333% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=6.9 · 2020=45.7 · 2021=36 · 2022=46.6 · 2023=14.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #234 safest of 259 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Georgia.

Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation (88 employees, TCR 21.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation
Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation (88 employees, TCR 21.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Harrington Park Health and Rehabilitation has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 14.6 14.6 0 8 0
2022 46.6 46.6 1 22 0
2021 36.0 31.8 6 11 0
2020 45.7 43.7 2 21 1
2018 6.9 6.9 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · GA · Augusta

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 373 employers in Augusta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FPNC, Inc. dba Twin Lakes Therapy and Living 21.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint Joseph's Rehabilitation & Residence 21.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vonderlieth Living Center 21.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9288-A27 21.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CVB Industrial Contracting INC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wheeler Services, Inc 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Headquarters 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc. 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA COKE 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR AU Medical Center, Inc. 5,630 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Minneapolis Police Dept. 21.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-154-Williams Sonoma 21.6 TCR
NAT-TCR American House - East I 21.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Delivered ON LLC 21.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 2800 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mondi Tekkote 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diversified Technical Systems Inc 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100524 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.