automotive body paint and interior repair and maintenance · Mississippi

Hattiesburg

Hattiesburg, MS · ~4,161 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hattiesburg runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical automotive body paint and interior repair and maintenance workplace, earning a grade A.

Hattiesburg: 0.9 TCR = 43% of automotive body paint and interior repair and maintenance BLS 2.1 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hattiesburg safety composite

Hattiesburg scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hattiesburg held a steady TCR band

Hattiesburg's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811121 · Hattiesburg, MS AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Reidsville
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~4,161 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reidsville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Hattiesburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hattiesburg averages 0.9 TCR (43% of the automotive body paint and interior repair and maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hattiesburg TCR series: 2016=0.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Hattiesburg falls in its industry

277 automotive body paint and inte establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 automotive body paint and inte employers in Mississippi.

Hattiesburg (4,161 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hattiesburg
Hattiesburg (4,161 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Hattiesburg has more employees than the automotive body paint and interior repai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.6 2.8 10 0 0
2021 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2020 1.8 1.2 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 5 0 0
2018 0.1 0.0 7 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 4 0 0
2016 0.1 0.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811121 · MS · Hattiesburg

277 automotive body paint and interior repair and maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 186 employers in Hattiesburg, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Reidsville 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cullman 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kumler Collision & Automotive 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Euless 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gulfport 4,273 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton Vehicle Assembly 4,703 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Dominic Jackson Memorial Hospital 2,937 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mississippi Baptist Medical Center 2,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR HATTIESBURG FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Processing Plant 1,173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant 1,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR merit health wesley 852 FTE
NAT-TCR Murfreesboro II 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 87-Usf-Olf Perimeter 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Florida Division 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Amanda Specialties LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Memorial Medical Center 4,160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lenox Hill Hosp 4,166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin SAS 4,168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Independent School District 196 4,172 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.