Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) · Mississippi

Processing Plant

Hattiesburg, MS · ~1,173 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Processing Plant runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) workplace, earning a grade B.

Processing Plant: 2.5 TCR = 75% of Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Processing Plant safety composite

Processing Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2022→2024

Processing Plant injury rate improved

Processing Plant's TCR fell 1.1 from 2.9 in 2022 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.9 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Hattiesburg, MS AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 75% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #12/41
  • PHOTO Koch Foods (Further …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 77 inj
  • SIZE ~1,173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Koch Foods (Further Processing) Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Processing Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Processing Plant averages 2.5 TCR (75% of the Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Processing Plant TCR series: 2022=2.9 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Processing Plant falls in its industry

509 Chickens, processing, fresh, f establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 41 Chickens, processing, fresh, f employers in Mississippi.

Processing Plant (1,173 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Processing Plant
Processing Plant (1,173 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Processing Plant has more employees than the Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, can median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.6 20 3 0
2023 2.8 1.8 26 5 1
2022 2.9 1.7 31 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · MS · Hattiesburg

509 Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 186 employers in Hattiesburg, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Koch Foods (Further Processing) Plant 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR GC7 Airport Dr, Gold Creek Processing, LLC. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Soules Foods Gainesville 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fertilizer Plant 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Baptist Memorial Hospital - Golden Triangle 1,172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olive Branch, MS Distribution Center 1,175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant 1,163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Regional Medical Center North Campus 1,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR HATTIESBURG FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hattiesburg 4,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR merit health wesley 852 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chain Electric Company 722 FTE
NAT-TCR Mobile Sales Location 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Marquette Fire Department 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Amtrol Inc West Warwick 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR DUNKIRK 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Campbell Soup Supply Company, INC 1,173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cumming Plant 1,173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ro Health, LLC 1,173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pritchard Industries, LLC. - NJ 1,173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.